The relationship : saving potentials and disguised unemployment is a topic that has been explored

in the works of economists like Nurkse and Lewis, both of whom provide
important insights into the dynamics of underdeveloped economies. Disguised unemployment,
a concept primarily associated with surplus labour in agricultural and
traditional sectors, is characterized by the presence of more workers than are
actually needed to produce a given level of output. This phenomenon often
results in low productivity and inefficiency, which can be detrimental to
economic development. Nurkse and Lewis, in their respective theories, have
highlighted how disguised unemployment interacts with saving potentials and
impacts the broader economic structure.

Nurkse’s theory emphasizes the idea of balanced growth, where he identifies the low levels of saving and investment in underdeveloped countries as a critical constraint to economic progress. He points out that disguised unemployment in such economies, particularly in rural and agricultural sectors,
represents a form of unutilized or underutilized labour. According to Nurkse, these surplus workers could be shifted to more productive sectors without adversely affecting the overall output of the economy. This reallocation of labour
can stimulate economic growth by increasing productivity and enhancing saving
potentials. The savings generated from increased productivity can then be
channelled into investments, which further catalyse development. In this sense,
disguised unemployment is not merely a burden but also an opportunity for
economies to mobilize idle resources and build their capacity for growth.

Lewis on the other hand, provides a dual-sector model that vividly

captures the transition of economies from traditional to modern sectors. He
argues that the traditional sector, typically agricultural, is characterized by
surplus labour, where the marginal productivity of labour is negligible or even
zero. This excess labour can be transferred to the industrial or modern sector,
where it contributes positively to output. Lewis’s model suggests that the
savings and investment dynamics in the modern sector are critical for
sustaining economic growth. As workers move from the traditional to the modern
sector, their productivity and incomes increase, leading to higher levels of
savings. These savings are then reinvested in the modern sector, creating a
virtuous cycle of growth and development. Disguised unemployment, in this
context, becomes a reservoir of labour that supports the expansion of the
modern sector without causing inflationary pressures on wages.

Both Nurkse and Lewis

highlight the importance of saving potentials in addressing the challenges
posed by disguised unemployment. In economies with high levels of disguised
unemployment, the ability to generate and mobilize savings is often constrained
by low incomes and limited access to financial institutions. However, as
surplus labour is absorbed into more productive sectors, income levels rise,
and the capacity to save increases. This process not only alleviates the
problem of disguised unemployment but also strengthens the financial base of
the economy, enabling greater investments in infrastructure, education, and
technology.

The interaction between saving
potentials and disguised unemployment is particularly significant in the
context of underdeveloped economies, where structural transformation is a key
objective. The presence of disguised unemployment indicates an inefficient
allocation of resources, which hinders economic growth. By improving
productivity and creating opportunities for labour to transition to
higher-value activities, these economies can unlock their potential for savings
and investment. For instance, investments in education and skill development
can enhance the employability of surplus labour, enabling their integration
into modern industries. Similarly, policies that promote industrialization and
urbanization can create demand for labour, facilitating the absorption of
disguised unemployment and generating additional savings.

Despite the theoretical clarity provided by Nurkse and Lewis, the practical implementation of their

ideas poses several challenges. In many underdeveloped economies, the process
of structural transformation is hindered by institutional weaknesses,
inadequate infrastructure, and social barriers. The reallocation of labour from
traditional to modern sectors requires not only economic but also social and
political adjustments. Moreover, the assumption that surplus labour can be
seamlessly transferred to productive activities without causing disruptions may
not always hold true. Factors such as mismatched skills, geographic immobility,
and resistance to change can limit the effectiveness of this transition.

Another critical aspect to
consider is the role of policy interventions in harnessing the saving
potentials associated with disguised unemployment. Governments play a vital
role in creating an enabling environment for economic transformation. This
includes investing in education and healthcare, developing infrastructure, and
fostering a conducive business climate. Additionally, financial inclusion
initiatives can help mobilize savings from previously excluded segments of the
population, including those affected by disguised unemployment. By providing access
to banking services, credit facilities, and microfinance, governments and
financial institutions can empower individuals to contribute to the economy’s
growth.

The relationship between
saving potentials and disguised unemployment is also influenced by external
factors such as global economic conditions, trade policies, and technological
advancements. For example, access to international markets and foreign direct
investment can provide additional resources for economic development.
Similarly, technological innovations can enhance productivity and create new
opportunities for labour absorption. However, these external factors can also
pose challenges, such as increased competition and the risk of dependency on
external sources of capital. Therefore, underdeveloped economies must strike a
balance between leveraging external opportunities and building their internal
capacities.

In conclusion, the concepts of
saving potentials and disguised unemployment are deeply interconnected, as
highlighted by the works of Nurkse and Lewis. Disguised unemployment, while
indicative of inefficiency, represents an opportunity for underdeveloped
economies to mobilize idle resources and drive economic growth. By enhancing
productivity and facilitating the transition of labour to more productive
sectors, these economies can unlock their saving potentials and strengthen
their financial base. However, achieving this transformation requires concerted
efforts at multiple levels, including policy interventions, institutional
reforms, and investments in human capital. While challenges remain, the
insights provided by Nurkse and Lewis offer a valuable framework for
understanding and addressing the complexities of economic development in the
context of disguised unemployment and saving potentials.